Legal Village

« A whole world of opportunity | Lawyers can be friends of the earth | Pomp and circumstance in the City »

Lawyers can be friends of the earth

Posted 16/03/2007 by Quentin Poole

I’ve discovered only recently – and to my personal benefit – that lawyers don’t have to cost the earth. But it did take me a while to get there.

My generation regarded material consumption as a right, not a privilege. Now I’m leading a law firm where the average age is 28 and I’ve discovered that I’m in the minority.

I knew times had changed on the day a brighter-than-bright law student we were pursuing emailed me with a request to join her on an environmental march. She was making a decision on which law firm to join on the speed and tone of positive responses.

I used to be a man in denial. Sure, I could see all the arguments and understood that people wanted us to be ‘carbon neutral’. But what, I asked, exactly do you want me to do? I’ve got a business to run!

Then one day, one of our young lawyers gave me a copy of a book called Change The World For A Fiver. To be honest, I thanked him politely, took one look at it and quietly laughed. I thought I’d take it home for one of my daughters.

But it fell open on a page that said ‘Talk to young people, they know cool stuff you don’t’ and that struck a chord. So I did. And talking and listening to young people has given me something which is better than a PhD in hindsight. It’s given me an insight into the future and is shaping my decisions about the firm.

I know we’re all driven – especially at this time in the financial year – by billing, time recovery, PEP forecasts and so on. But we are all on the start of a learning curve when it comes to environmental issues and most of us working in the legal sector are wealthy enough to make some informed choices that will lead the way. Our people expect it.

Tempted? Take a look at www.wearewhatwedo.org and make it one of your 'favourites', as I have. Some of my partners will probably think I’ve gone soft in my old age, but I don’t think any of us should be too old to fit energy-saving light-bulbs, decline to use plastic carrier bags and cups, or share a bath with someone.

Comments

I'm happy to support reduced consumption wherever possible but on the basis of limited planetary resources not alleged anthropomorphic climate change. I won't go into the scientific detail here but suffice it to mention that as well as being a solicitor I have been a Fellow of the Royal Meteorological Society since 1968 and I find the evidence for human induced climate change unconvincing.

The best approach is subsidy of helpful technological fixes by producers rather than penalising consumers through taxes that get misapplied on vote buying social engineering projects.

I'm puzzled by the lack of any mention of population issues in all this. If the world population keeps growing we can reduce our consumption to the level of the Middle Ages yet still run out of resources.

Unless the population issue is addressed the obvious conclusion is that all the current concern is motivated by political manipulation rather than genuine concern for humanity or the planet.

I'm of the same generation and I recall material consumption for it's own sake always having been regarded as undesirable.

As for yonger people knowing more than those of us with more life experience I have come to the opposite conclusion. In my discussions with the young I find them woefully ignorant of basic principles that were taken for granted 30 years ago.

I find them highly appreciative of anyone who can put the propoganda into a historical and sociological perspective. Even if they disagree it gives them a better basis for assessing evidence generally.


Post a comment

If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by Legal Week before your comment will appear.

 

match case
use regular expressions